Skip to main content
UK Constituency Data Hex Maps

Ofsted inspections (England)

Updated:

This page provides constituency-level data on Ofsted inspection outcomes in England as of July 2024 for early years, state-funded schools, children's social care, and further education and skills providers.

Early years§

This map shows the percentage of early years providers with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 11 (9%)
Good: 106 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 40 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 17 (22%)
Good: 61 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Amber Valley
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 46 (98%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 11 (17%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Ashfield
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 51 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashford
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 72 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 5 (6%)
Good: 71 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Aylesbury
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 67 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Banbury
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 59 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barking
Outstanding: 5 (7%)
Good: 63 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Barnsley North
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 50 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Barnsley South
Outstanding: 13 (19%)
Good: 50 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 26 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 67 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Basingstoke
Outstanding: 12 (11%)
Good: 93 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 45 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Bath
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Battersea
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 56 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Beaconsfield
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 79 (86%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: 22 (17%)
Good: 108 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Bedford
Outstanding: 12 (20%)
Good: 46 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 62 (94%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 47 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 9 (19%)
Good: 37 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 12 (29%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: 7 (7%)
Good: 87 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Birkenhead
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 13 (25%)
Good: 33 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 47 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 48 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 39 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 9 (15%)
Good: 49 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 41 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 57 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 50 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackburn
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 80 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool South
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 44 (94%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 40 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 9 (14%)
Good: 52 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bolsover
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton North East
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 52 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 57 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Bolton West
Outstanding: 11 (18%)
Good: 48 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Bootle
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 29 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 41 (98%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bournemouth East
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 62 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 43 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bracknell
Outstanding: 19 (15%)
Good: 107 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford East
Outstanding: 12 (19%)
Good: 50 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford South
Outstanding: 11 (19%)
Good: 47 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford West
Outstanding: 12 (19%)
Good: 50 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Braintree
Outstanding: 15 (25%)
Good: 45 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent East
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 64 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Brent West
Outstanding: 3 (4%)
Good: 63 (91%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 92 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 14 (21%)
Good: 51 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bridgwater
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 43 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 48 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bristol Central
Outstanding: 13 (27%)
Good: 33 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol East
Outstanding: 11 (14%)
Good: 65 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Bristol North East
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 62 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Bristol North West
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 52 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol South
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 61 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: 16 (29%)
Good: 40 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: 21 (17%)
Good: 100 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 61 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Broxbourne
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 74 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Broxtowe
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 41 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 13 (18%)
Good: 60 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Burnley
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 36 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 40 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bury North
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury South
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 68 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 50 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Calder Valley
Outstanding: 17 (22%)
Good: 60 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cambridge
Outstanding: 16 (24%)
Good: 52 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cannock Chase
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 43 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Canterbury
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 33 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Carlisle
Outstanding: 11 (22%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 85 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Castle Point
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Central Devon
Outstanding: 14 (22%)
Good: 48 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 47 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 75 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Cheadle
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 66 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelmsford
Outstanding: 17 (22%)
Good: 59 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 13 (20%)
Good: 50 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Cheltenham
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: 13 (14%)
Good: 79 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 44 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesterfield
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 46 (96%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Chichester
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 57 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 81 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Chippenham
Outstanding: 17 (18%)
Good: 77 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: 17 (18%)
Good: 69 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Chorley
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Christchurch
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 44 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 17 (32%)
Good: 36 (68%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) City of Durham
Outstanding: 11 (24%)
Good: 31 (69%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Clacton
Outstanding: 12 (24%)
Good: 38 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Colchester
Outstanding: 22 (28%)
Good: 54 (69%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Colne Valley
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 67 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Congleton
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 43 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 58 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Coventry East
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Coventry North West
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry South
Outstanding: 11 (20%)
Good: 41 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 48 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Crawley
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 54 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Croydon East
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 81 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon South
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 76 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon West
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 66 (84%)
Requires improvement: 5 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 68 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Darlington
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 51 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dartford
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 83 (86%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Daventry
Outstanding: 9 (11%)
Good: 71 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Derby North
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 42 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Derby South
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 58 (94%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 43 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 46 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 75 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 75 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster North
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 72 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: 22 (23%)
Good: 72 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 37 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 42 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Dudley
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 25 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 92 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: 9 (8%)
Good: 98 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: 7 (9%)
Good: 69 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing North
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 74 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 54 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 12 (13%)
Good: 76 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Easington
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: 13 (20%)
Good: 53 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Ham
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) East Hampshire
Outstanding: 12 (16%)
Good: 61 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Surrey
Outstanding: 15 (16%)
Good: 78 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) East Thanet
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Wiltshire
Outstanding: 19 (18%)
Good: 80 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 66 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastbourne
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 44 (94%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastleigh
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 74 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 74 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 50 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: 17 (13%)
Good: 109 (83%)
Requires improvement: 5 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 25 (26%)
Good: 71 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Enfield North
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 84 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Epping Forest
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 79 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 27 (22%)
Good: 96 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Erewash
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 47 (94%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: 6 (4%)
Good: 122 (90%)
Requires improvement: 5 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (1%) Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 23 (17%)
Good: 108 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Exeter
Outstanding: 7 (21%)
Good: 25 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 47 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 67 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 56 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 12 (17%)
Good: 57 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 9 (14%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: 12 (16%)
Good: 60 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 14 (19%)
Good: 60 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 29 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 41 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 17 (23%)
Good: 57 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Fylde
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 39 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Gainsborough
Outstanding: 1 (1%)
Good: 68 (96%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 44 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Gedling
Outstanding: 3 (3%)
Good: 87 (95%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 65 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Gloucester
Outstanding: 5 (7%)
Good: 63 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 14 (18%)
Good: 61 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 58 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 1 (1%)
Good: 81 (94%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Gosport
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gower
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 57 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Gravesham
Outstanding: 5 (7%)
Good: 69 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 44 (81%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 32 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: 13 (14%)
Good: 75 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (3%) Guildford
Outstanding: 14 (17%)
Good: 69 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 15 (14%)
Good: 86 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (3%) Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 53 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Halesowen
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 42 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Halifax
Outstanding: 13 (21%)
Good: 50 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 79 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 13 (18%)
Good: 58 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 60 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 7 (11%)
Good: 57 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Harlow
Outstanding: 11 (14%)
Good: 62 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 17 (17%)
Good: 80 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 11 (21%)
Good: 40 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow East
Outstanding: 9 (14%)
Good: 49 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Harrow West
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 61 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Hartlepool
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 43 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: 11 (16%)
Good: 55 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 34 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Havant
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 46 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 56 (86%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 9 (11%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: 12 (13%)
Good: 75 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Hendon
Outstanding: 14 (15%)
Good: 76 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 65 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 41 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 12 (20%)
Good: 48 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: 16 (16%)
Good: 82 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertsmere
Outstanding: 14 (15%)
Good: 74 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Hexham
Outstanding: 13 (27%)
Good: 36 (73%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 78 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) High Peak
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 50 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 5 (5%)
Good: 84 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Hitchin
Outstanding: 19 (17%)
Good: 91 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 59 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: 15 (26%)
Good: 42 (74%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 70 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 13 (15%)
Good: 71 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Horsham
Outstanding: 21 (22%)
Good: 75 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: 11 (34%)
Good: 21 (66%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 16 (25%)
Good: 46 (73%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Huddersfield
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 61 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Huntingdon
Outstanding: 18 (20%)
Good: 71 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Hyndburn
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 81 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Ilford North
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 65 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Ilford South
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 56 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Ipswich
Outstanding: 13 (25%)
Good: 40 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: 4 (14%)
Good: 22 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (7%) Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: 5 (18%)
Good: 22 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington North
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 70 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 13 (17%)
Good: 62 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 37 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: 8 (14%)
Good: 51 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 16 (25%)
Good: 46 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 12 (20%)
Good: 44 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Kettering
Outstanding: 10 (10%)
Good: 83 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 3 (3%) Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 9 (9%)
Good: 85 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Knowsley
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 11 (25%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds East
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 62 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Leeds North East
Outstanding: 21 (24%)
Good: 64 (74%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North West
Outstanding: 26 (31%)
Good: 59 (69%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds South
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 70 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 13 (12%)
Good: 95 (84%)
Requires improvement: 4 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 13 (16%)
Good: 66 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Leicester East
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Leicester South
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 39 (98%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester West
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 42 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 65 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewes
Outstanding: 16 (35%)
Good: 30 (65%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham East
Outstanding: 9 (8%)
Good: 102 (86%)
Requires improvement: 4 (3%)
Inadequate: 4 (3%) Lewisham North
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 78 (85%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: 10 (9%)
Good: 94 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Lichfield
Outstanding: 14 (29%)
Good: 34 (69%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Lincoln
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 71 (96%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 60 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 3 (11%)
Good: 22 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 46 (96%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 51 (94%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Loughborough
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 51 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 42 (98%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lowestoft
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Luton North
Outstanding: 13 (19%)
Good: 52 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Macclesfield
Outstanding: 13 (24%)
Good: 42 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Maidenhead
Outstanding: 17 (19%)
Good: 71 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: 14 (13%)
Good: 89 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Makerfield
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 50 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Maldon
Outstanding: 14 (22%)
Good: 50 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Central
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 59 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 49 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 41 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Mansfield
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 44 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: 14 (20%)
Good: 57 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 60 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 11 (17%)
Good: 51 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 19 (20%)
Good: 76 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 22 (21%)
Good: 81 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 49 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%) Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 57 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 73 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 1 (1%)
Good: 79 (96%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 39 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 80 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 43 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 78 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 62 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: 5 (4%)
Good: 112 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Monmouthshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 13 (18%)
Good: 57 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest East
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 50 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest West
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Newark
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 48 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Newbury
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 62 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 12 (21%)
Good: 44 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 29 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: 17 (23%)
Good: 58 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 8 (14%)
Good: 47 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 47 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 36 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 51 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 14 (18%)
Good: 63 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) North Cornwall
Outstanding: 9 (15%)
Good: 50 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) North Cotswolds
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 42 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Devon
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 43 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) North Dorset
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 43 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) North Durham
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 12 (17%)
Good: 59 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 40 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 25 (20%)
Good: 93 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 12 (13%)
Good: 77 (82%)
Requires improvement: 4 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: 7 (9%)
Good: 72 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 38 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Norfolk
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) North Northumberland
Outstanding: 9 (22%)
Good: 30 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) North Shropshire
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 43 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Somerset
Outstanding: 12 (14%)
Good: 70 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 65 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 80 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Essex
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 59 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 19 (18%)
Good: 85 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Norfolk
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 43 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Northampton North
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 53 (84%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Northampton South
Outstanding: 14 (16%)
Good: 72 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Norwich North
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 54 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Norwich South
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 28 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham East
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 28 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 58 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Nottingham South
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 46 (94%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Nuneaton
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 60 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 10 (8%)
Good: 106 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 45 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: 6 (9%)
Good: 58 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Orpington
Outstanding: 16 (14%)
Good: 98 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Oxford East
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 54 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Peckham
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 78 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 12 (24%)
Good: 37 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: 10 (18%)
Good: 46 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 11 (24%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Peterborough
Outstanding: 19 (19%)
Good: 77 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 42 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 42 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontypridd
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Poole
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 45 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 63 (91%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 11 (22%)
Good: 38 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Preston
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Putney
Outstanding: 11 (14%)
Good: 64 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 66 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 12 (22%)
Good: 43 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: 15 (23%)
Good: 51 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Reading Central
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 68 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 80 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Redcar
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 67 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Redditch
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Reigate
Outstanding: 21 (18%)
Good: 94 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 59 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Richmond Park
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 82 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 50 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Rochdale
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 52 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 64 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Romford
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 72 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 10 (15%)
Good: 58 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 14 (17%)
Good: 66 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Rother Valley
Outstanding: 12 (18%)
Good: 52 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Rotherham
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 50 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Rugby
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 62 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: 16 (18%)
Good: 68 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 11 (16%)
Good: 57 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 82 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 12 (15%)
Good: 66 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 46 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Salford
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 62 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Salisbury
Outstanding: 14 (20%)
Good: 53 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 56 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 11 (19%)
Good: 47 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Sefton Central
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 41 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Selby
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 75 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 18 (22%)
Good: 65 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 55 (96%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: 14 (26%)
Good: 37 (69%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield South East
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 44 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 63 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Shipley
Outstanding: 24 (25%)
Good: 71 (74%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 19 (32%)
Good: 39 (66%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 73 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 53 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: 3 (4%)
Good: 71 (95%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Slough
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 61 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Smethwick
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 69 (97%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 15 (21%)
Good: 54 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 60 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 22 (27%)
Good: 60 (73%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 56 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 59 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) South Devon
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 44 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Dorset
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 44 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 41 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 49 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Leicestershire
Outstanding: 5 (6%)
Good: 78 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) South Norfolk
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 57 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 11 (10%)
Good: 93 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) South Ribble
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 68 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shields
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 36 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shropshire
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) South Suffolk
Outstanding: 11 (22%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Devon
Outstanding: 22 (31%)
Good: 47 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 14 (16%)
Good: 72 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 11 (21%)
Good: 41 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: 15 (19%)
Good: 57 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 60 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Southampton Test
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 54 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: 11 (16%)
Good: 55 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 17 (21%)
Good: 63 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 61 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Southport
Outstanding: 5 (21%)
Good: 19 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Spelthorne
Outstanding: 16 (13%)
Good: 102 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Spen Valley
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 56 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) St Albans
Outstanding: 25 (24%)
Good: 78 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: 13 (23%)
Good: 40 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) St Helens North
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 40 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) St Ives
Outstanding: 16 (36%)
Good: 28 (62%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 25 (26%)
Good: 71 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Stafford
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 34 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 37 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 61 (98%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Stevenage
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 85 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockport
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 78 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Stockton North
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 37 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockton West
Outstanding: 12 (15%)
Good: 69 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 32 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 31 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 44 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stourbridge
Outstanding: 14 (30%)
Good: 31 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 49 (91%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: 14 (29%)
Good: 34 (69%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: 3 (2%)
Good: 112 (93%)
Requires improvement: 5 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 76 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Stroud
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 60 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 43 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 33 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 21 (24%)
Good: 65 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 42 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 50 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 80 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Swansea West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon North
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 73 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon South
Outstanding: 7 (9%)
Good: 70 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Tamworth
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 82 (93%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tatton
Outstanding: 10 (17%)
Good: 48 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 10 (20%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Telford
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 59 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 80 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) The Wrekin
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 46 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: 15 (23%)
Good: 49 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Thurrock
Outstanding: 14 (16%)
Good: 70 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 9 (22%)
Good: 29 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Tonbridge
Outstanding: 13 (15%)
Good: 76 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tooting
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Torbay
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 45 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 44 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Tottenham
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 62 (90%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: 26 (24%)
Good: 82 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Twickenham
Outstanding: 10 (10%)
Good: 86 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Tynemouth
Outstanding: 11 (18%)
Good: 48 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 10 (10%)
Good: 85 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%) Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 14 (19%)
Good: 57 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Wallasey
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 38 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Walthamstow
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Warrington North
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 52 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Warrington South
Outstanding: 14 (19%)
Good: 59 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: 17 (26%)
Good: 49 (74%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 30 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Watford
Outstanding: 9 (10%)
Good: 80 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Waveney Valley
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 42 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 15 (25%)
Good: 45 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 64 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 25 (21%)
Good: 93 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) West Bromwich
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 41 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) West Dorset
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 41 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 66 (96%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) West Lancashire
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 41 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) West Suffolk
Outstanding: 18 (23%)
Good: 59 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 38 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 60 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 25 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Wigan
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Wimbledon
Outstanding: 14 (12%)
Good: 103 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 3 (2%) Winchester
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 59 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Windsor
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 73 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Wirral West
Outstanding: 12 (18%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Witham
Outstanding: 16 (22%)
Good: 55 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Witney
Outstanding: 7 (11%)
Good: 58 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Woking
Outstanding: 9 (9%)
Good: 89 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Wokingham
Outstanding: 14 (15%)
Good: 77 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 36 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 25 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Worcester
Outstanding: 12 (22%)
Good: 41 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 59 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Worthing West
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Wrexham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wycombe
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 64 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 13 (27%)
Good: 32 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: 9 (11%)
Good: 68 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%) Yeovil
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (89%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) York Central
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) York Outer
Outstanding: 23 (27%)
Good: 62 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: (%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)
CSV
JSON

State-funded schools§

This map shows the percentage of state-funded schools with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 25 (60%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 4 (10%) Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 34 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 13 (36%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Amber Valley
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 42 (81%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashfield
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 3 (8%) Ashford
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Aylesbury
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 27 (68%)
Requires improvement: 7 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Banbury
Outstanding: 9 (19%)
Good: 35 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barking
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 30 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barnsley North
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 30 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Barnsley South
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: 8 (26%)
Good: 21 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Basingstoke
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 39 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bath
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 30 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Battersea
Outstanding: 4 (20%)
Good: 14 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Beaconsfield
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: 10 (33%)
Good: 20 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bedford
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: 10 (29%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: 16 (33%)
Good: 31 (65%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 27 (64%)
Requires improvement: 7 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 24 (67%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Birkenhead
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 29 (66%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 27 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 42 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 32 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 37 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 20 (31%)
Good: 37 (58%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%) Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: 9 (19%)
Good: 33 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 25 (64%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 31 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 43 (74%)
Requires improvement: 7 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Blackburn
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 43 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 36 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 4 (8%) Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 5 (16%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool South
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 24 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 21 (66%)
Requires improvement: 4 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 22 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolsover
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 44 (83%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bolton North East
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 41 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Bolton West
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 26 (68%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Bootle
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 4 (11%) Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 31 (67%)
Requires improvement: 11 (24%)
Inadequate: (%) Bournemouth East
Outstanding: 8 (33%)
Good: 16 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 5 (20%)
Good: 19 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Bracknell
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 27 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Bradford East
Outstanding: 11 (23%)
Good: 31 (65%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Bradford South
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 29 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Bradford West
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 35 (66%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Braintree
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 37 (93%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent East
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent West
Outstanding: 8 (29%)
Good: 19 (68%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Bridgwater
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (77%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 34 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 4 (17%)
Good: 13 (54%)
Requires improvement: 6 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 22 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Bristol Central
Outstanding: 6 (25%)
Good: 15 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (8%) Bristol East
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 24 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (16%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Bristol North East
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 28 (78%)
Requires improvement: 6 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol North West
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol South
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 22 (61%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 39 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: 5 (20%)
Good: 19 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Broxbourne
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 34 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Broxtowe
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 32 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 32 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Burnley
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 35 (66%)
Requires improvement: 8 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 42 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury North
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Bury South
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 4 (10%) Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 37 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Calder Valley
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 41 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 32 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Cambridge
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Cannock Chase
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 34 (89%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Canterbury
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 26 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Carlisle
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 40 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 10 (26%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Castle Point
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Central Devon
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Cheadle
Outstanding: 10 (25%)
Good: 28 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelmsford
Outstanding: 10 (27%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 14 (42%)
Good: 19 (58%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cheltenham
Outstanding: 8 (25%)
Good: 22 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 29 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 4 (9%) Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 8 (23%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Chesterfield
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Chichester
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 35 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 9 (28%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chippenham
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 7 (19%)
Inadequate: (%) Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 34 (74%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chorley
Outstanding: 11 (21%)
Good: 40 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Christchurch
Outstanding: 3 (12%)
Good: 21 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 7 (24%)
Good: 21 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) City of Durham
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Clacton
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 21 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: 12 (35%)
Good: 20 (59%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Colchester
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Colne Valley
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Congleton
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 28 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 40 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry East
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 33 (70%)
Requires improvement: 9 (19%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry North West
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 32 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry South
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 24 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Crawley
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 27 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 32 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon East
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon South
Outstanding: 10 (29%)
Good: 22 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon West
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Darlington
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Dartford
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 28 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Daventry
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 45 (82%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Derby North
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Derby South
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 36 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 59 (82%)
Requires improvement: 6 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%) Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 34 (72%)
Requires improvement: 9 (19%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 8 (18%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster North
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 35 (80%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 31 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Dudley
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (19%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 7 (24%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 3 (7%) Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: 11 (34%)
Good: 20 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing North
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 29 (74%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 11 (32%)
Good: 23 (68%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 8 (24%)
Good: 22 (65%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Easington
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 40 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) East Ham
Outstanding: 13 (41%)
Good: 19 (59%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Hampshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 37 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) East Surrey
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Thanet
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) East Wiltshire
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 37 (70%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 4 (14%)
Good: 23 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastbourne
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 6 (21%)
Inadequate: 2 (7%) Eastleigh
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 26 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: 3 (11%)
Good: 23 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 27 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 37 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Enfield North
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 42 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Epping Forest
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 13 (36%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Erewash
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 30 (79%)
Requires improvement: 7 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 5 (19%)
Good: 22 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Exeter
Outstanding: 4 (14%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 6 (21%)
Inadequate: (%) Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 31 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 10 (23%)
Good: 30 (68%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 10 (26%)
Good: 26 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 30 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 46 (84%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 35 (70%)
Requires improvement: 10 (20%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Fylde
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 26 (70%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Gainsborough
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 48 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: 11 (27%)
Good: 28 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Gedling
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Gloucester
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 30 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 3 (7%) Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 37 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 13 (31%)
Good: 24 (57%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Gosport
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Gower
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 37 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Gravesham
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: 8 (27%)
Good: 20 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Guildford
Outstanding: 10 (30%)
Good: 23 (70%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 12 (32%)
Good: 23 (62%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 15 (39%)
Good: 23 (61%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Halesowen
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 24 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Halifax
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 34 (74%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 28 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 18 (49%)
Good: 19 (51%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: 9 (35%)
Good: 16 (62%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 26 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Harlow
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 37 (82%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 13 (28%)
Good: 29 (63%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow East
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 23 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow West
Outstanding: 7 (28%)
Good: 18 (72%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hartlepool
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Havant
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 34 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 25 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Hendon
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 26 (72%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 42 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 32 (67%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: 12 (24%)
Good: 35 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertsmere
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Hexham
Outstanding: 7 (11%)
Good: 53 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) High Peak
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 46 (85%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Hitchin
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 32 (71%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 13 (41%)
Good: 19 (59%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 29 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Horsham
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 32 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 2 (9%)
Good: 20 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Huddersfield
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Huntingdon
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Hyndburn
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 39 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Ilford North
Outstanding: 7 (20%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Ilford South
Outstanding: 8 (28%)
Good: 17 (59%)
Requires improvement: 4 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Ipswich
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 17 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (19%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 20 (74%)
Requires improvement: 7 (26%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington North
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 15 (39%)
Good: 23 (61%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 32 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 10 (32%)
Good: 19 (61%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Kettering
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 33 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 8 (24%)
Good: 23 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Knowsley
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 38 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 3 (13%)
Good: 19 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds East
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North East
Outstanding: 10 (31%)
Good: 22 (69%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North West
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Leeds South
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 4 (15%)
Good: 21 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 31 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Leicester East
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 33 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester South
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 25 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester West
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 26 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 30 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewes
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham East
Outstanding: 7 (21%)
Good: 25 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham North
Outstanding: 7 (23%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 7 (25%)
Good: 21 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lichfield
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Lincoln
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 28 (65%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 24 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (16%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 11 (31%)
Good: 19 (54%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 8 (23%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Loughborough
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Lowestoft
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 24 (65%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 3 (8%) Luton North
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 27 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Macclesfield
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Maidenhead
Outstanding: 13 (30%)
Good: 26 (59%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: 10 (24%)
Good: 29 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Makerfield
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Maldon
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Central
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 25 (64%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 5 (18%)
Good: 22 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Mansfield
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: (%) Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 32 (76%)
Requires improvement: 7 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 40 (85%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 41 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 22 (67%)
Requires improvement: 5 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 26 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 37 (74%)
Requires improvement: 8 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 25 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 35 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 40 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 11 (26%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 22 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Monmouthshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest East
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest West
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Newark
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 45 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Newbury
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 32 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 24 (63%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 27 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 30 (73%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 31 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 33 (69%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: (%) North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: 9 (18%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North Cornwall
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 45 (76%)
Requires improvement: 10 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) North Cotswolds
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 48 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) North Devon
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 46 (82%)
Requires improvement: 7 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) North Dorset
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) North Durham
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 32 (74%)
Requires improvement: 8 (19%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 48 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) North Norfolk
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 41 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) North Northumberland
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 50 (88%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) North Shropshire
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 42 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) North Somerset
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 39 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North West Essex
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 41 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 40 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) North West Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 45 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Northampton North
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 35 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Northampton South
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Norwich North
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 6 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Norwich South
Outstanding: 11 (28%)
Good: 22 (56%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Nottingham East
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 33 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Nottingham South
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Nuneaton
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 32 (74%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Orpington
Outstanding: 10 (29%)
Good: 22 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Oxford East
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Peckham
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 47 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 63 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Peterborough
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 8 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 28 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontypridd
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Poole
Outstanding: 2 (9%)
Good: 19 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 12 (39%)
Good: 16 (52%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 2 (8%)
Good: 21 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Preston
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Putney
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: 11 (28%)
Good: 28 (70%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 23 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Reading Central
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 29 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Redcar
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Redditch
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Reigate
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 11 (18%)
Good: 40 (67%)
Requires improvement: 8 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Richmond Park
Outstanding: 13 (42%)
Good: 18 (58%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 51 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) Rochdale
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Romford
Outstanding: 6 (20%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 10 (18%)
Good: 40 (70%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%) Rother Valley
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 30 (68%)
Requires improvement: 8 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Rotherham
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 36 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Rugby
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: 7 (25%)
Good: 20 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 35 (67%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 4 (8%) Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 27 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 35 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Salford
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 31 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Salisbury
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 32 (64%)
Requires improvement: 11 (22%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 32 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Sefton Central
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 33 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Selby
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 41 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 30 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 4 (25%)
Good: 12 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 23 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 28 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Sheffield South East
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 28 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 33 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Shipley
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 8 (22%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%) Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 25 (66%)
Requires improvement: 7 (18%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 56 (79%)
Requires improvement: 5 (7%)
Inadequate: 4 (6%) Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Slough
Outstanding: 11 (27%)
Good: 27 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Smethwick
Outstanding: 8 (20%)
Good: 29 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 28 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 41 (79%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (74%)
Requires improvement: 7 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) South Devon
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) South Dorset
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: 7 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 32 (64%)
Requires improvement: 7 (14%)
Inadequate: 5 (10%) South Leicestershire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (76%)
Requires improvement: 8 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) South Norfolk
Outstanding: 10 (24%)
Good: 27 (64%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 46 (75%)
Requires improvement: 7 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) South Ribble
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 35 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shields
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) South Shropshire
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 47 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) South Suffolk
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Devon
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 31 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 12 (30%)
Good: 28 (70%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 37 (74%)
Requires improvement: 9 (18%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 18 (56%)
Requires improvement: 6 (19%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Southampton Test
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 22 (67%)
Requires improvement: 6 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 6 (21%)
Good: 22 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 10 (26%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Southport
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Spelthorne
Outstanding: 3 (11%)
Good: 23 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Spen Valley
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) St Albans
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 35 (74%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) St Helens North
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 28 (68%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 8 (24%)
Good: 21 (64%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) St Ives
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 40 (74%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 4 (7%) St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Stafford
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 6 (16%)
Inadequate: (%) Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 39 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 37 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Stevenage
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Stockport
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 26 (58%)
Requires improvement: 9 (20%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Stockton North
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 27 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockton West
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 27 (69%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 34 (87%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Stourbridge
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 15 (38%)
Good: 22 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 36 (71%)
Requires improvement: 7 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: 11 (38%)
Good: 17 (59%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 34 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Stroud
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 32 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 34 (92%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 25 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 33 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 25 (74%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 7 (28%)
Good: 18 (72%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swansea West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon North
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 34 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Swindon South
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Tamworth
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 7 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Tatton
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 32 (76%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 35 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Telford
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 32 (73%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 31 (76%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) The Wrekin
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 54 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 6 (9%) Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Thurrock
Outstanding: 8 (21%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 8 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Tonbridge
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 31 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Tooting
Outstanding: 9 (30%)
Good: 20 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Torbay
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 26 (79%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Tottenham
Outstanding: 13 (30%)
Good: 28 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 32 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Twickenham
Outstanding: 15 (42%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tynemouth
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 10 (25%)
Good: 27 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 13 (36%)
Good: 20 (56%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Wallasey
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 8 (23%)
Inadequate: (%) Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 37 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Walthamstow
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Warrington North
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Warrington South
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: (%) Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Watford
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 26 (67%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Waveney Valley
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 40 (73%)
Requires improvement: 9 (16%)
Inadequate: (%) Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (78%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 40 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 32 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) West Bromwich
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 25 (71%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) West Dorset
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 35 (73%)
Requires improvement: 9 (19%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: 14 (33%)
Good: 26 (62%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) West Lancashire
Outstanding: 13 (22%)
Good: 42 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%) West Suffolk
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 32 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 42 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%) Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 56 (90%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: 8 (14%)
Good: 40 (71%)
Requires improvement: 7 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 47 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 8 (20%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Wigan
Outstanding: 11 (31%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Wimbledon
Outstanding: 9 (30%)
Good: 21 (70%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Winchester
Outstanding: 10 (23%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Windsor
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 35 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Wirral West
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Witham
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Witney
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 39 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Woking
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 23 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Wokingham
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 36 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 30 (65%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 11 (24%)
Good: 32 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%) Worcester
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 27 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 33 (67%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%) Worthing West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 22 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Wrexham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wycombe
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 23 (64%)
Requires improvement: 6 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%) Yeovil
Outstanding: 10 (23%)
Good: 27 (61%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 3 (7%) York Central
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) York Outer
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 25 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)
CSV
JSON

Children's social care§

This map shows the percentage of children's social care providers with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Amber Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashfield
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashford
Outstanding: 2 (18%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: (%) Aylesbury
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Banbury
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barking
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barnsley North
Outstanding: 4 (31%)
Good: 8 (62%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (8%) Barnsley South
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Basingstoke
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 5 (33%)
Good: 9 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Bath
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Battersea
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Beaconsfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bedford
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 4 (31%)
Good: 8 (62%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birkenhead
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 5 (29%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%) Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 11 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (21%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 2 (18%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackburn
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 12 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool South
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 27 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolsover
Outstanding: 4 (67%)
Good: 1 (17%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton North East
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%) Bolton West
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%) Bootle
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bournemouth East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bracknell
Outstanding: 3 (50%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford South
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Braintree
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bridgwater
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 4 (44%)
Requires improvement: 4 (44%)
Inadequate: (%) Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol Central
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol East
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol North East
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol North West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 3 (33%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Broxbourne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Broxtowe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Burnley
Outstanding: 1 (5%)
Good: 13 (68%)
Requires improvement: 4 (21%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%) Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 14 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury North
Outstanding: 2 (14%)
Good: 10 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (20%)
Requires improvement: 4 (80%)
Inadequate: (%) Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Calder Valley
Outstanding: 4 (24%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%) Cambridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cannock Chase
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 17 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (9%) Canterbury
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Carlisle
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Castle Point
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Central Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cheadle
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 9 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelmsford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cheltenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 9 (90%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesterfield
Outstanding: 3 (38%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chichester
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chippenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chorley
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 12 (67%)
Requires improvement: 5 (28%)
Inadequate: (%) Christchurch
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) City of Durham
Outstanding: 5 (31%)
Good: 10 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Clacton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Colchester
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Colne Valley
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%) Congleton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 7 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry North West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Crawley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 9 (69%)
Requires improvement: 3 (23%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%) Croydon South
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon West
Outstanding: 3 (21%)
Good: 11 (79%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Darlington
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 11 (58%)
Requires improvement: 6 (32%)
Inadequate: (%) Dartford
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Daventry
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Derby North
Outstanding: 4 (31%)
Good: 8 (62%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Derby South
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 6 (50%)
Requires improvement: 5 (42%)
Inadequate: (%) Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%) Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 4 (33%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster North
Outstanding: 3 (38%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%) Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (50%) Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 5 (23%)
Good: 17 (77%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dudley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Easington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Ham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Hampshire
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Surrey
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Thanet
Outstanding: 4 (19%)
Good: 14 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) East Wiltshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 3 (43%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastbourne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastleigh
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Enfield North
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Epping Forest
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 2 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Erewash
Outstanding: 5 (42%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Esher and Walton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Exeter
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%) Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Forest of Dean
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Fylde
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 29 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Gainsborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Gedling
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 4 (44%)
Requires improvement: 3 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Gloucester
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%) Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 16 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Gosport
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gower
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Gravesham
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (50%) Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 3 (43%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Guildford
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Halesowen
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (29%) Halifax
Outstanding: 6 (27%)
Good: 13 (59%)
Requires improvement: 3 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 3 (33%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%) Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Harlow
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow West
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Hartlepool
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 10 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%) Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Havant
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%) Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (8%) Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hendon
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%) Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 5 (25%)
Good: 14 (70%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertsmere
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hexham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 3 (12%)
Good: 20 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) High Peak
Outstanding: 5 (33%)
Good: 8 (53%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 3 (30%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Hitchin
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Horsham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Huddersfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: (%) Huntingdon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hyndburn
Outstanding: 4 (20%)
Good: 12 (60%)
Requires improvement: 4 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Ilford North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 12 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Ilford South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 12 (71%)
Requires improvement: 4 (24%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%) Ipswich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington North
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kettering
Outstanding: 2 (18%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Knowsley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 13 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%) Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 5 (24%)
Good: 13 (62%)
Requires improvement: 2 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%) Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds East
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds South
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester East
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester South
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester West
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewes
Outstanding: 5 (50%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: (%) Lichfield
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lincoln
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%) Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Loughborough
Outstanding: 5 (71%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lowestoft
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Luton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Macclesfield
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Maidenhead
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Makerfield
Outstanding: 3 (18%)
Good: 11 (65%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Maldon
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Mansfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 15 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 2 (15%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (15%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (8%) Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (30%)
Inadequate: (%) Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Monmouthshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 7 (24%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest East
Outstanding: 6 (38%)
Good: 8 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest West
Outstanding: 3 (50%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newark
Outstanding: 5 (33%)
Good: 7 (47%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (7%) Newbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 4 (20%)
Good: 12 (60%)
Requires improvement: 4 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 2 (15%)
Good: 9 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 3 (33%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 10 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) North Cornwall
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Cotswolds
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) North Dorset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) North Durham
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 13 (72%)
Requires improvement: 3 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 2 (10%)
Good: 17 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: (%) North Norfolk
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Northumberland
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Shropshire
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 14 (74%)
Requires improvement: 2 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%) North Somerset
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 3 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 3 (43%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Essex
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Norfolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Northampton North
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 5 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Northampton South
Outstanding: 1 (7%)
Good: 9 (64%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: 3 (21%) Norwich North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Norwich South
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham East
Outstanding: 5 (29%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 2 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham South
Outstanding: 3 (30%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Nuneaton
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%) Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 14 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Orpington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%) Oxford East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Peckham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 13 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Peterborough
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 3 (25%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontypridd
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Poole
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%) Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Preston
Outstanding: 3 (14%)
Good: 12 (57%)
Requires improvement: 5 (24%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%) Putney
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 3 (27%)
Good: 6 (55%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (9%) Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Reading Central
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Redcar
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Redditch
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Reigate
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 2 (13%)
Good: 7 (47%)
Requires improvement: 5 (33%)
Inadequate: 1 (7%) Richmond Park
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Rochdale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 13 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Romford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 3 (12%)
Good: 20 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Rother Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Rotherham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Rugby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (25%) Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 3 (43%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Salford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Salisbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Sefton Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (40%)
Requires improvement: 4 (40%)
Inadequate: 2 (20%) Selby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%) Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 5 (56%)
Good: 3 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield South East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Shipley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 8 (28%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%) Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Slough
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%) Smethwick
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) South Cotswolds
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) South Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Dorset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 2 (13%)
Good: 10 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) South Leicestershire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) South Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) South Ribble
Outstanding: 3 (20%)
Good: 6 (40%)
Requires improvement: 6 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shields
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shropshire
Outstanding: 1 (5%)
Good: 17 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) South Suffolk
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 7 (70%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Devon
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (9%) Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Southampton Test
Outstanding: 3 (50%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Southport
Outstanding: 3 (14%)
Good: 15 (68%)
Requires improvement: 4 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Spelthorne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Spen Valley
Outstanding: 3 (25%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 2 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) St Albans
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Helens North
Outstanding: 4 (17%)
Good: 13 (57%)
Requires improvement: 6 (26%)
Inadequate: (%) St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 7 (41%)
Inadequate: (%) St Ives
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stafford
Outstanding: 2 (13%)
Good: 11 (69%)
Requires improvement: 3 (19%)
Inadequate: (%) Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%) Stevenage
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockport
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 14 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%) Stockton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockton West
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 11 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (21%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 2 (8%)
Good: 20 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 23 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Stourbridge
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Stroud
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: (%) Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 3 (43%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Swansea West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Tamworth
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Tatton
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%) Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 2 (8%)
Good: 20 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Telford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) The Wrekin
Outstanding: 1 (5%)
Good: 17 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%) Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Thurrock
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tonbridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tooting
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Torbay
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 3 (27%)
Good: 6 (55%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Tottenham
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Twickenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tynemouth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%) Wallasey
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 3 (38%)
Inadequate: (%) Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Walthamstow
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Warrington North
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 19 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%) Warrington South
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (20%) Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Watford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Waveney Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 3 (25%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: (%) Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) West Bromwich
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) West Dorset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) West Lancashire
Outstanding: 4 (18%)
Good: 14 (64%)
Requires improvement: 4 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) West Suffolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 13 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (7%) Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 16 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: (%) Wigan
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 10 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: (%) Wimbledon
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Winchester
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Windsor
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wirral West
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Witham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (17%) Witney
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Woking
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wokingham
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 11 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 13 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: (%) Worcester
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: (%) Worthing West
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wrexham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wycombe
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Yeovil
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) York Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) York Outer
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)
CSV
JSON

Further education and skills§

This map shows the percentage of further education and skills providers with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Amber Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashfield
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Aylesbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Banbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barking
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Barnsley North
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Barnsley South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Basingstoke
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Bath
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Battersea
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Beaconsfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bedford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birkenhead
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 2 (33%)
Requires improvement: 3 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 21 (78%)
Requires improvement: 5 (19%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackburn
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blackpool South
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolsover
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (20%)
Requires improvement: 3 (60%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%) Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Bolton West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bootle
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: (%) Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bournemouth East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bracknell
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford East
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bradford West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Braintree
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Brent West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bridgwater
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol East
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol North West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bristol South
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Broxbourne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (100%) Broxtowe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Burnley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (40%) Bury North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Calder Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cambridge
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cannock Chase
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Canterbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Cardiff West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Carlisle
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Castle Point
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Central Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cheadle
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelmsford
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Cheltenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Chesterfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (25%) Chichester
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chippenham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Chorley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Christchurch
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 3 (13%)
Good: 15 (65%)
Requires improvement: 5 (22%)
Inadequate: (%) City of Durham
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Clacton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Colchester
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Colne Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Congleton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry North West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Coventry South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 4 (44%)
Inadequate: (%) Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Crawley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Croydon West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 2 (29%) Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Darlington
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dartford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Daventry
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Derby North
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Derby South
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 7 (70%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%) Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Doncaster North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dudley
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ealing Southall
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Easington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Ham
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Hampshire
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Surrey
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Thanet
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Wiltshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastbourne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Eastleigh
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Enfield North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Epping Forest
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Erewash
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Exeter
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%) Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Fylde
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gainsborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%) Gedling
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gloucester
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gosport
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gower
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Gravesham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Guildford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Halesowen
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%) Halifax
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harlow
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Harrow West
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hartlepool
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Havant
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hazel Grove
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hendon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 3 (38%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Hertsmere
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hexham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) High Peak
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hitchin
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 2 (10%)
Good: 16 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%) Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Horsham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Huddersfield
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Huntingdon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Hyndburn
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Ilford North
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ilford South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 1 (50%) Ipswich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington North
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 3 (30%)
Inadequate: (%) Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kettering
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (38%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%) Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Knowsley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 3 (20%)
Good: 9 (60%)
Requires improvement: 3 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds North West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester South
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leicester West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewes
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Lichfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lincoln
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 1 (50%) Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 13 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (12%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Loughborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Lowestoft
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Luton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Macclesfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Maidenhead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Makerfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%) Maldon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 14 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 4 (57%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Manchester Withington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mansfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid Sussex
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Monmouthshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) New Forest West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newark
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 11 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Abbot
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: (%) Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Cornwall
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) North Cotswolds
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Dorset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Durham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (100%) North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Hampshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Herefordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Norfolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Northumberland
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Shropshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Somerset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Essex
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) North West Norfolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Northampton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Northampton South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Norwich North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Norwich South
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Nottingham South
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Nuneaton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Orpington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Oxford East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Peckham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Peterborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Pontypridd
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Poole
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: (%) Portsmouth North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Portsmouth South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Preston
Outstanding: 3 (75%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Putney
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Reading Central
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Redcar
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (100%) Redditch
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (20%)
Requires improvement: 4 (80%)
Inadequate: (%) Reigate
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Ribble Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Richmond Park
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Rochdale
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Romford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rother Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rotherham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Rugby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rushcliffe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Salford
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 1 (17%)
Requires improvement: 4 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Salisbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Scunthorpe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Sefton Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Selby
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sevenoaks
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 7 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sheffield South East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Shipley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Slough
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Smethwick
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) South Derbyshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) South Dorset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) South East Cornwall
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) South Leicestershire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Norfolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Ribble
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shields
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Shropshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South Suffolk
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Devon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Norfolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Southampton Test
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Southport
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Spelthorne
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Spen Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Albans
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Helens North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) St Ives
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stafford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stevenage
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockport
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockton North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stockton West
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%) Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stourbridge
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: (%) Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%) Stroud
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sunderland Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: (%) Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sussex Weald
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Swansea West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Swindon South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Tamworth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tatton
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%) Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Telford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) The Wrekin
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Thurrock
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tonbridge
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tooting
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Torbay
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tottenham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Twickenham
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Tynemouth
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: (%) Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 10 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: (%) Wallasey
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Walthamstow
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Warrington North
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Warrington South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: (%) Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: (%) Watford
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: (%) Waveney Valley
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Weald of Kent
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) West Bromwich
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%) West Dorset
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (17%) West Lancashire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%) West Suffolk
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) West Worcestershire
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: (%) Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wigan
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wimbledon
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Winchester
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Windsor
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wirral West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: (%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Witham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Witney
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Woking
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Wokingham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 3 (43%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%) Worcester
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Worthing West
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wrexham
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Wycombe
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Wyre Forest
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: (%) Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) Yeovil
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: (%) York Central
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%) York Outer
Outstanding: (%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: (%)
Inadequate: (%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)
CSV
JSON