Skip to main content

Ofsted inspections (England)

Updated:

This page provides constituency-level data on Ofsted inspection outcomes in England as of July 2024 for early years, state-funded schools, children's social care, and further education and skills providers.

Early years§

This map shows the percentage of early years providers with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 11 (9%)
Good: 106 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 40 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 17 (22%)
Good: 61 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Amber Valley
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 46 (98%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 11 (17%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Ashfield
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 51 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashford
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 72 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 5 (6%)
Good: 71 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Aylesbury
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 67 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Banbury
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 59 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Barking
Outstanding: 5 (7%)
Good: 63 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barnsley North
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 50 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Barnsley South
Outstanding: 13 (19%)
Good: 50 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 26 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 67 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Basingstoke
Outstanding: 12 (11%)
Good: 93 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 45 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bath
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Battersea
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 56 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Beaconsfield
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 79 (86%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: 22 (17%)
Good: 108 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bedford
Outstanding: 12 (20%)
Good: 46 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 62 (94%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 47 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 9 (19%)
Good: 37 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 12 (29%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: 7 (7%)
Good: 87 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birkenhead
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 13 (25%)
Good: 33 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 47 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 48 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 39 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 9 (15%)
Good: 49 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 41 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 57 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 50 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackburn
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 80 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackpool South
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 44 (94%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 40 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 9 (14%)
Good: 52 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bolsover
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolton North East
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 52 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 57 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Bolton West
Outstanding: 11 (18%)
Good: 48 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bootle
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 29 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 41 (98%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bournemouth East
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 62 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 43 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bracknell
Outstanding: 19 (15%)
Good: 107 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford East
Outstanding: 12 (19%)
Good: 50 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford South
Outstanding: 11 (19%)
Good: 47 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford West
Outstanding: 12 (19%)
Good: 50 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Braintree
Outstanding: 15 (25%)
Good: 45 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brent East
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 64 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Brent West
Outstanding: 3 (4%)
Good: 63 (91%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 92 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 14 (21%)
Good: 51 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bridgwater
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 43 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 48 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bristol Central
Outstanding: 13 (27%)
Good: 33 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol East
Outstanding: 11 (14%)
Good: 65 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Bristol North East
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 62 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Bristol North West
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 52 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol South
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 61 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: 16 (29%)
Good: 40 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: 21 (17%)
Good: 100 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 61 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broxbourne
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 74 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broxtowe
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 41 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 13 (18%)
Good: 60 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Burnley
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 36 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 40 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bury North
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury South
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 68 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 50 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Calder Valley
Outstanding: 17 (22%)
Good: 60 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cambridge
Outstanding: 16 (24%)
Good: 52 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cannock Chase
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 43 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Canterbury
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 33 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff North
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Carlisle
Outstanding: 11 (22%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 85 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Castle Point
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Central Devon
Outstanding: 14 (22%)
Good: 48 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 47 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 75 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Cheadle
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 66 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelmsford
Outstanding: 17 (22%)
Good: 59 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 13 (20%)
Good: 50 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Cheltenham
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: 13 (14%)
Good: 79 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 44 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesterfield
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 46 (96%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Chichester
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 57 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 81 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chippenham
Outstanding: 17 (18%)
Good: 77 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: 17 (18%)
Good: 69 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Chorley
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Christchurch
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 44 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 17 (32%)
Good: 36 (68%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
City of Durham
Outstanding: 11 (24%)
Good: 31 (69%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Clacton
Outstanding: 12 (24%)
Good: 38 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Colchester
Outstanding: 22 (28%)
Good: 54 (69%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Colne Valley
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 67 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Congleton
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 43 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 58 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Coventry East
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Coventry North West
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry South
Outstanding: 11 (20%)
Good: 41 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 48 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crawley
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 54 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Croydon East
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 81 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon South
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 76 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon West
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 66 (84%)
Requires improvement: 5 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 68 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Darlington
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 51 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dartford
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 83 (86%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Daventry
Outstanding: 9 (11%)
Good: 71 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Derby North
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 42 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derby South
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 58 (94%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 43 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 46 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 75 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 75 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster North
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 72 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: 22 (23%)
Good: 72 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 37 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 42 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Dudley
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 25 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 8 (8%)
Good: 92 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: 9 (8%)
Good: 98 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: 7 (9%)
Good: 69 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing North
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 74 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 54 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 12 (13%)
Good: 76 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Easington
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: 13 (20%)
Good: 53 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Ham
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
East Hampshire
Outstanding: 12 (16%)
Good: 61 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Surrey
Outstanding: 15 (16%)
Good: 78 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
East Thanet
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Wiltshire
Outstanding: 19 (18%)
Good: 80 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 66 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastbourne
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 44 (94%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastleigh
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 74 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 74 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 50 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: 17 (13%)
Good: 109 (83%)
Requires improvement: 5 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 25 (26%)
Good: 71 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Enfield North
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 84 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epping Forest
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 79 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 27 (22%)
Good: 96 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erewash
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 47 (94%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: 6 (4%)
Good: 122 (90%)
Requires improvement: 5 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (1%)
Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 23 (17%)
Good: 108 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exeter
Outstanding: 7 (21%)
Good: 25 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 47 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 67 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 56 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 12 (17%)
Good: 57 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 9 (14%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: 12 (16%)
Good: 60 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 14 (19%)
Good: 60 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 29 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 41 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 17 (23%)
Good: 57 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Fylde
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 39 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gainsborough
Outstanding: 1 (1%)
Good: 68 (96%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 44 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gedling
Outstanding: 3 (3%)
Good: 87 (95%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 65 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gloucester
Outstanding: 5 (7%)
Good: 63 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 14 (18%)
Good: 61 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 58 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 1 (1%)
Good: 81 (94%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Gosport
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gower
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 57 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Gravesham
Outstanding: 5 (7%)
Good: 69 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 44 (81%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 32 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: 13 (14%)
Good: 75 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (3%)
Guildford
Outstanding: 14 (17%)
Good: 69 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 15 (14%)
Good: 86 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (3%)
Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 53 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Halesowen
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 42 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Halifax
Outstanding: 13 (21%)
Good: 50 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 79 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 13 (18%)
Good: 58 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 60 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 7 (11%)
Good: 57 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harlow
Outstanding: 11 (14%)
Good: 62 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 17 (17%)
Good: 80 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 11 (21%)
Good: 40 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow East
Outstanding: 9 (14%)
Good: 49 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Harrow West
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 61 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Hartlepool
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 43 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: 11 (16%)
Good: 55 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 34 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Havant
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 46 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 56 (86%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 9 (11%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: 12 (13%)
Good: 75 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hendon
Outstanding: 14 (15%)
Good: 76 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 65 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 41 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 12 (20%)
Good: 48 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: 16 (16%)
Good: 82 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertsmere
Outstanding: 14 (15%)
Good: 74 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Hexham
Outstanding: 13 (27%)
Good: 36 (73%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 78 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
High Peak
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 50 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 5 (5%)
Good: 84 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hitchin
Outstanding: 19 (17%)
Good: 91 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 59 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: 15 (26%)
Good: 42 (74%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 70 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 13 (15%)
Good: 71 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Horsham
Outstanding: 21 (22%)
Good: 75 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: 11 (34%)
Good: 21 (66%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 16 (25%)
Good: 46 (73%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Huddersfield
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 61 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Huntingdon
Outstanding: 18 (20%)
Good: 71 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hyndburn
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 81 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Ilford North
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 65 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Ilford South
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 56 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ipswich
Outstanding: 13 (25%)
Good: 40 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: 4 (14%)
Good: 22 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (7%)
Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: 5 (18%)
Good: 22 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington North
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 70 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 13 (17%)
Good: 62 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 37 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: 8 (14%)
Good: 51 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 16 (25%)
Good: 46 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 12 (20%)
Good: 44 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kettering
Outstanding: 10 (10%)
Good: 83 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 3 (3%)
Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 9 (9%)
Good: 85 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Knowsley
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 11 (25%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds East
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 62 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Leeds North East
Outstanding: 21 (24%)
Good: 64 (74%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds North West
Outstanding: 26 (31%)
Good: 59 (69%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds South
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 70 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 13 (12%)
Good: 95 (84%)
Requires improvement: 4 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 13 (16%)
Good: 66 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Leicester East
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Leicester South
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 39 (98%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester West
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 42 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 65 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewes
Outstanding: 16 (35%)
Good: 30 (65%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham East
Outstanding: 9 (8%)
Good: 102 (86%)
Requires improvement: 4 (3%)
Inadequate: 4 (3%)
Lewisham North
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 78 (85%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: 10 (9%)
Good: 94 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Lichfield
Outstanding: 14 (29%)
Good: 34 (69%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Lincoln
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 71 (96%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 60 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 3 (11%)
Good: 22 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 46 (96%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 51 (94%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Loughborough
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 51 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 42 (98%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lowestoft
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Luton North
Outstanding: 13 (19%)
Good: 52 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Macclesfield
Outstanding: 13 (24%)
Good: 42 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maidenhead
Outstanding: 17 (19%)
Good: 71 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: 14 (13%)
Good: 89 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Makerfield
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 50 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maldon
Outstanding: 14 (22%)
Good: 50 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Central
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 59 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 49 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 41 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mansfield
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 44 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: 14 (20%)
Good: 57 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 60 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 11 (17%)
Good: 51 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 19 (20%)
Good: 76 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 22 (21%)
Good: 81 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 49 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%)
Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 57 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: 10 (12%)
Good: 73 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 1 (1%)
Good: 79 (96%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 39 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 80 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 43 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 78 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 62 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: 5 (4%)
Good: 112 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Monmouthshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 13 (18%)
Good: 57 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
New Forest East
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 50 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
New Forest West
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newark
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 48 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newbury
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 62 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 12 (21%)
Good: 44 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 29 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: 17 (23%)
Good: 58 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 8 (14%)
Good: 47 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 47 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 36 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 51 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 14 (18%)
Good: 63 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
North Cornwall
Outstanding: 9 (15%)
Good: 50 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Cotswolds
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 42 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Devon
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 43 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Dorset
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 43 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Durham
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 12 (17%)
Good: 59 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 40 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 25 (20%)
Good: 93 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 12 (13%)
Good: 77 (82%)
Requires improvement: 4 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: 7 (9%)
Good: 72 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 38 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Norfolk
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
North Northumberland
Outstanding: 9 (22%)
Good: 30 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Shropshire
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 43 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Somerset
Outstanding: 12 (14%)
Good: 70 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 65 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 80 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Essex
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 59 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 19 (18%)
Good: 85 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Norfolk
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 43 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Northampton North
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 53 (84%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Northampton South
Outstanding: 14 (16%)
Good: 72 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Norwich North
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 54 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Norwich South
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 28 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham East
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 28 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 58 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Nottingham South
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 46 (94%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nuneaton
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 60 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 10 (8%)
Good: 106 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 45 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: 6 (9%)
Good: 58 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Orpington
Outstanding: 16 (14%)
Good: 98 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oxford East
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 54 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peckham
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 78 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 12 (24%)
Good: 37 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: 10 (18%)
Good: 46 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 11 (24%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peterborough
Outstanding: 19 (19%)
Good: 77 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 42 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 42 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontypridd
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Poole
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 45 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 63 (91%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 11 (22%)
Good: 38 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Preston
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Putney
Outstanding: 11 (14%)
Good: 64 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: 10 (13%)
Good: 66 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 12 (22%)
Good: 43 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: 15 (23%)
Good: 51 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reading Central
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 68 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 80 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Redcar
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 67 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Redditch
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Reigate
Outstanding: 21 (18%)
Good: 94 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 59 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Richmond Park
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 82 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 50 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Rochdale
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 52 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 64 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Romford
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 72 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 10 (15%)
Good: 58 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 14 (17%)
Good: 66 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rother Valley
Outstanding: 12 (18%)
Good: 52 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Rotherham
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 50 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rugby
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 62 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: 16 (18%)
Good: 68 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 11 (16%)
Good: 57 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 11 (12%)
Good: 82 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 12 (15%)
Good: 66 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 46 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Salford
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 62 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Salisbury
Outstanding: 14 (20%)
Good: 53 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 56 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 11 (19%)
Good: 47 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Sefton Central
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 41 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Selby
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 75 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 18 (22%)
Good: 65 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 55 (96%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: 14 (26%)
Good: 37 (69%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 46 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield South East
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 44 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 63 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Shipley
Outstanding: 24 (25%)
Good: 71 (74%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 19 (32%)
Good: 39 (66%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 73 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 53 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: 3 (4%)
Good: 71 (95%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Slough
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 61 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Smethwick
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 69 (97%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 15 (21%)
Good: 54 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 60 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 22 (27%)
Good: 60 (73%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 6 (10%)
Good: 56 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 59 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Devon
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 44 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Dorset
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 44 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 41 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 49 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Leicestershire
Outstanding: 5 (6%)
Good: 78 (92%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Norfolk
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 57 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 11 (10%)
Good: 93 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Ribble
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 68 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shields
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 36 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shropshire
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
South Suffolk
Outstanding: 11 (22%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Devon
Outstanding: 22 (31%)
Good: 47 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 14 (16%)
Good: 72 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 11 (21%)
Good: 41 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: 15 (19%)
Good: 57 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 60 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southampton Test
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 54 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: 11 (16%)
Good: 55 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 17 (21%)
Good: 63 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 11 (15%)
Good: 61 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Southport
Outstanding: 5 (21%)
Good: 19 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Spelthorne
Outstanding: 16 (13%)
Good: 102 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Spen Valley
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 56 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
St Albans
Outstanding: 25 (24%)
Good: 78 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: 13 (23%)
Good: 40 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
St Helens North
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 40 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Ives
Outstanding: 16 (36%)
Good: 28 (62%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 25 (26%)
Good: 71 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stafford
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 34 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 37 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 61 (98%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stevenage
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 85 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockport
Outstanding: 18 (18%)
Good: 78 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Stockton North
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 37 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockton West
Outstanding: 12 (15%)
Good: 69 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 32 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 31 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 44 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stourbridge
Outstanding: 14 (30%)
Good: 31 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 49 (91%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: 14 (29%)
Good: 34 (69%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: 3 (2%)
Good: 112 (93%)
Requires improvement: 5 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 10 (11%)
Good: 76 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stroud
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 60 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 43 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 33 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 21 (24%)
Good: 65 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 42 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 50 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 7 (8%)
Good: 80 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swansea West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Swindon North
Outstanding: 8 (10%)
Good: 73 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swindon South
Outstanding: 7 (9%)
Good: 70 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tamworth
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 82 (93%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tatton
Outstanding: 10 (17%)
Good: 48 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 10 (20%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Telford
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 59 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 8 (9%)
Good: 80 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
The Wrekin
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 46 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: 15 (23%)
Good: 49 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: 10 (14%)
Good: 58 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thurrock
Outstanding: 14 (16%)
Good: 70 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 9 (22%)
Good: 29 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Tonbridge
Outstanding: 13 (15%)
Good: 76 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tooting
Outstanding: 11 (13%)
Good: 71 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torbay
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 45 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 44 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tottenham
Outstanding: 4 (6%)
Good: 62 (90%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: 26 (24%)
Good: 82 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Twickenham
Outstanding: 10 (10%)
Good: 86 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tynemouth
Outstanding: 11 (18%)
Good: 48 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 10 (10%)
Good: 85 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 8 (12%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%)
Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 14 (19%)
Good: 57 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wallasey
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 38 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Walthamstow
Outstanding: 6 (7%)
Good: 76 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warrington North
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 52 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Warrington South
Outstanding: 14 (19%)
Good: 59 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: 17 (26%)
Good: 49 (74%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 30 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Watford
Outstanding: 9 (10%)
Good: 80 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Waveney Valley
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 42 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 15 (25%)
Good: 45 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 8 (11%)
Good: 64 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 25 (21%)
Good: 93 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Bromwich
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 41 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
West Dorset
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 41 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 66 (96%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Lancashire
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 41 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
West Suffolk
Outstanding: 18 (23%)
Good: 59 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 38 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 60 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 51 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 25 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wigan
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Wimbledon
Outstanding: 14 (12%)
Good: 103 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 3 (2%)
Winchester
Outstanding: 16 (21%)
Good: 59 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Windsor
Outstanding: 15 (17%)
Good: 73 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Wirral West
Outstanding: 12 (18%)
Good: 54 (82%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Witham
Outstanding: 16 (22%)
Good: 55 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Witney
Outstanding: 7 (11%)
Good: 58 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Woking
Outstanding: 9 (9%)
Good: 89 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wokingham
Outstanding: 14 (15%)
Good: 77 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 36 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 25 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Worcester
Outstanding: 12 (22%)
Good: 41 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: 9 (13%)
Good: 59 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Worthing West
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Wrexham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wycombe
Outstanding: 7 (10%)
Good: 64 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 13 (27%)
Good: 32 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: 9 (11%)
Good: 68 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (2%)
Yeovil
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 48 (89%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Central
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 54 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Outer
Outstanding: 23 (27%)
Good: 62 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (1%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)

State-funded schools§

This map shows the percentage of state-funded schools with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 25 (60%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 4 (10%)
Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 34 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 13 (36%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Amber Valley
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 42 (81%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashfield
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 3 (8%)
Ashford
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Aylesbury
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 27 (68%)
Requires improvement: 7 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Banbury
Outstanding: 9 (19%)
Good: 35 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Barking
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 30 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barnsley North
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 30 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barnsley South
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 51 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: 8 (26%)
Good: 21 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Basingstoke
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 39 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bath
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 30 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Battersea
Outstanding: 4 (20%)
Good: 14 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beaconsfield
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: 10 (33%)
Good: 20 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bedford
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: 10 (29%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: 16 (33%)
Good: 31 (65%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 27 (64%)
Requires improvement: 7 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 24 (67%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birkenhead
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 29 (66%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 27 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 42 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 32 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 37 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 20 (31%)
Good: 37 (58%)
Requires improvement: 4 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%)
Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: 9 (19%)
Good: 33 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 25 (64%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 31 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 43 (74%)
Requires improvement: 7 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Blackburn
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 43 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 36 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 4 (8%)
Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 5 (16%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackpool South
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 24 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 21 (66%)
Requires improvement: 4 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 22 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolsover
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 44 (83%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bolton North East
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 9 (16%)
Good: 41 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Bolton West
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 26 (68%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bootle
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 4 (11%)
Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 31 (67%)
Requires improvement: 11 (24%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bournemouth East
Outstanding: 8 (33%)
Good: 16 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 5 (20%)
Good: 19 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bracknell
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 27 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Bradford East
Outstanding: 11 (23%)
Good: 31 (65%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Bradford South
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 29 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Bradford West
Outstanding: 9 (17%)
Good: 35 (66%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Braintree
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 37 (93%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brent East
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brent West
Outstanding: 8 (29%)
Good: 19 (68%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bridgwater
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (77%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 34 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 4 (17%)
Good: 13 (54%)
Requires improvement: 6 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 22 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Bristol Central
Outstanding: 6 (25%)
Good: 15 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 2 (8%)
Bristol East
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 24 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (16%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Bristol North East
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 28 (78%)
Requires improvement: 6 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol North West
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol South
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 22 (61%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 39 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: 5 (20%)
Good: 19 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broxbourne
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 34 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Broxtowe
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 32 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 32 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Burnley
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 35 (66%)
Requires improvement: 8 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 42 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury North
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Bury South
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 4 (10%)
Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 37 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Calder Valley
Outstanding: 8 (15%)
Good: 41 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 32 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cambridge
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cannock Chase
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 34 (89%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Canterbury
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 26 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff North
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Carlisle
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 40 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 10 (26%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Castle Point
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Central Devon
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Cheadle
Outstanding: 10 (25%)
Good: 28 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelmsford
Outstanding: 10 (27%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 14 (42%)
Good: 19 (58%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cheltenham
Outstanding: 8 (25%)
Good: 22 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 29 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 4 (9%)
Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 8 (23%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Chesterfield
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chichester
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 35 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 9 (28%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chippenham
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 7 (19%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 34 (74%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chorley
Outstanding: 11 (21%)
Good: 40 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Christchurch
Outstanding: 3 (12%)
Good: 21 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 7 (24%)
Good: 21 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
City of Durham
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Clacton
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 21 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: 12 (35%)
Good: 20 (59%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Colchester
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 36 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Colne Valley
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Congleton
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 28 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 40 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry East
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 33 (70%)
Requires improvement: 9 (19%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry North West
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 32 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry South
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 24 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crawley
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 27 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 32 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon East
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon South
Outstanding: 10 (29%)
Good: 22 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon West
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Darlington
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Dartford
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 28 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Daventry
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 45 (82%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derby North
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Derby South
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 36 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 59 (82%)
Requires improvement: 6 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (1%)
Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 34 (72%)
Requires improvement: 9 (19%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 39 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 8 (18%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster North
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 35 (80%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 31 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dudley
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (19%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 7 (24%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 3 (7%)
Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: 11 (34%)
Good: 20 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing North
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 29 (74%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 11 (32%)
Good: 23 (68%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 8 (24%)
Good: 22 (65%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Easington
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 40 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Ham
Outstanding: 13 (41%)
Good: 19 (59%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Hampshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 37 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Surrey
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Thanet
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Wiltshire
Outstanding: 5 (9%)
Good: 37 (70%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 4 (14%)
Good: 23 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastbourne
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 6 (21%)
Inadequate: 2 (7%)
Eastleigh
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 26 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: 3 (11%)
Good: 23 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 27 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 37 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Enfield North
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 42 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epping Forest
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 13 (36%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Erewash
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 30 (79%)
Requires improvement: 7 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 5 (19%)
Good: 22 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exeter
Outstanding: 4 (14%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 6 (21%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 31 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 10 (23%)
Good: 30 (68%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 10 (26%)
Good: 26 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 30 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 46 (84%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 35 (70%)
Requires improvement: 10 (20%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Fylde
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 26 (70%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gainsborough
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 48 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: 11 (27%)
Good: 28 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gedling
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 38 (81%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Gloucester
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 30 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 3 (7%)
Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 37 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 13 (31%)
Good: 24 (57%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Gosport
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Gower
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 37 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gravesham
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: 8 (27%)
Good: 20 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Guildford
Outstanding: 10 (30%)
Good: 23 (70%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 12 (32%)
Good: 23 (62%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 15 (39%)
Good: 23 (61%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Halesowen
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 24 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Halifax
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 34 (74%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 28 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 18 (49%)
Good: 19 (51%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: 9 (35%)
Good: 16 (62%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 26 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harlow
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 37 (82%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 13 (28%)
Good: 29 (63%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow East
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 23 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow West
Outstanding: 7 (28%)
Good: 18 (72%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hartlepool
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Havant
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 34 (89%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 25 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hendon
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 26 (72%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 42 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 32 (67%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: 12 (24%)
Good: 35 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertsmere
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Hexham
Outstanding: 7 (11%)
Good: 53 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
High Peak
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 46 (85%)
Requires improvement: 6 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hitchin
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 32 (71%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 13 (41%)
Good: 19 (59%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 29 (81%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Horsham
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 34 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 32 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 2 (9%)
Good: 20 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Huddersfield
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Huntingdon
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hyndburn
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 39 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Ilford North
Outstanding: 7 (20%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ilford South
Outstanding: 8 (28%)
Good: 17 (59%)
Requires improvement: 4 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ipswich
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 17 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (19%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 20 (74%)
Requires improvement: 7 (26%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington North
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 23 (72%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 15 (39%)
Good: 23 (61%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 32 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 10 (32%)
Good: 19 (61%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Kettering
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 33 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 33 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 8 (24%)
Good: 23 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Knowsley
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 30 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 38 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 3 (13%)
Good: 19 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds East
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds North East
Outstanding: 10 (31%)
Good: 22 (69%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds North West
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Leeds South
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 4 (15%)
Good: 21 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 31 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Leicester East
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 33 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester South
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 25 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester West
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 26 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 30 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewes
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham East
Outstanding: 7 (21%)
Good: 25 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham North
Outstanding: 7 (23%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 7 (25%)
Good: 21 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lichfield
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lincoln
Outstanding: 8 (19%)
Good: 28 (65%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 24 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (16%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 11 (31%)
Good: 19 (54%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 8 (23%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Loughborough
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lowestoft
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 24 (65%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 3 (8%)
Luton North
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 27 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Macclesfield
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Maidenhead
Outstanding: 13 (30%)
Good: 26 (59%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: 10 (24%)
Good: 29 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Makerfield
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Maldon
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (79%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Central
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 25 (64%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 5 (18%)
Good: 22 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mansfield
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 32 (76%)
Requires improvement: 7 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 40 (85%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 41 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 22 (67%)
Requires improvement: 5 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 26 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 37 (74%)
Requires improvement: 8 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 25 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 35 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 40 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 11 (26%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 22 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Monmouthshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 47 (87%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
New Forest East
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 32 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
New Forest West
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Newark
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 45 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newbury
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 32 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 24 (63%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 27 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 30 (73%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 31 (86%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 10 (21%)
Good: 33 (69%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: 9 (18%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North Cornwall
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 45 (76%)
Requires improvement: 10 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
North Cotswolds
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 48 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Devon
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 46 (82%)
Requires improvement: 7 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Dorset
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 35 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Durham
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 32 (74%)
Requires improvement: 8 (19%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 5 (8%)
Good: 48 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Norfolk
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 41 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Northumberland
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 50 (88%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Shropshire
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 42 (89%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Somerset
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 39 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North West Essex
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 41 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 40 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
North West Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 45 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Northampton North
Outstanding: 8 (16%)
Good: 35 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Northampton South
Outstanding: 6 (19%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Norwich North
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 6 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Norwich South
Outstanding: 11 (28%)
Good: 22 (56%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Nottingham East
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 33 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Nottingham South
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nuneaton
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 4 (12%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (76%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 32 (74%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Orpington
Outstanding: 10 (29%)
Good: 22 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 39 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oxford East
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 33 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Peckham
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 10 (16%)
Good: 47 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 31 (84%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 9 (12%)
Good: 63 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peterborough
Outstanding: 3 (7%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 8 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 28 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontypridd
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Poole
Outstanding: 2 (9%)
Good: 19 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 12 (39%)
Good: 16 (52%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 2 (8%)
Good: 21 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Preston
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Putney
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 24 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: 11 (28%)
Good: 28 (70%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 6 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 23 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reading Central
Outstanding: 7 (18%)
Good: 29 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 45 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Redcar
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Redditch
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Reigate
Outstanding: 5 (16%)
Good: 24 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 11 (18%)
Good: 40 (67%)
Requires improvement: 8 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Richmond Park
Outstanding: 13 (42%)
Good: 18 (58%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: 3 (5%)
Good: 51 (86%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
Rochdale
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 29 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Romford
Outstanding: 6 (20%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 10 (18%)
Good: 40 (70%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 3 (5%)
Rother Valley
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 30 (68%)
Requires improvement: 8 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rotherham
Outstanding: 7 (15%)
Good: 36 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Rugby
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 34 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: 7 (25%)
Good: 20 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 35 (67%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 4 (8%)
Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 27 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 35 (80%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Salford
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 31 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Salisbury
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 34 (76%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 32 (64%)
Requires improvement: 11 (22%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 32 (73%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Sefton Central
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 33 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Selby
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 41 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 30 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 4 (25%)
Good: 12 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 23 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 28 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Sheffield South East
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 28 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 33 (87%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Shipley
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 26 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 8 (22%)
Inadequate: 2 (6%)
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 25 (66%)
Requires improvement: 7 (18%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 6 (8%)
Good: 56 (79%)
Requires improvement: 5 (7%)
Inadequate: 4 (6%)
Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Slough
Outstanding: 11 (27%)
Good: 27 (66%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Smethwick
Outstanding: 8 (20%)
Good: 29 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 28 (88%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 41 (79%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 7 (14%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (74%)
Requires improvement: 7 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
South Devon
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 36 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
South Dorset
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 27 (82%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 38 (78%)
Requires improvement: 7 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 32 (64%)
Requires improvement: 7 (14%)
Inadequate: 5 (10%)
South Leicestershire
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 31 (76%)
Requires improvement: 8 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Norfolk
Outstanding: 10 (24%)
Good: 27 (64%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 8 (13%)
Good: 46 (75%)
Requires improvement: 7 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Ribble
Outstanding: 8 (17%)
Good: 35 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shields
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 28 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
South Shropshire
Outstanding: 4 (7%)
Good: 47 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Suffolk
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Devon
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 31 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 12 (30%)
Good: 28 (70%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 37 (74%)
Requires improvement: 9 (18%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 5 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 7 (22%)
Good: 18 (56%)
Requires improvement: 6 (19%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Southampton Test
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 22 (67%)
Requires improvement: 6 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 26 (84%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 6 (21%)
Good: 22 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 10 (26%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southport
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 29 (91%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Spelthorne
Outstanding: 3 (11%)
Good: 23 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Spen Valley
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
St Albans
Outstanding: 12 (26%)
Good: 35 (74%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
St Helens North
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 28 (68%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 8 (24%)
Good: 21 (64%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Ives
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 40 (74%)
Requires improvement: 9 (17%)
Inadequate: 4 (7%)
St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 35 (78%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stafford
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 6 (16%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 39 (75%)
Requires improvement: 5 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 37 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Stevenage
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Stockport
Outstanding: 9 (20%)
Good: 26 (58%)
Requires improvement: 9 (20%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Stockton North
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 27 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockton West
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 27 (69%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 5 (13%)
Good: 34 (87%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 6 (16%)
Good: 27 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 38 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stourbridge
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 24 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 15 (38%)
Good: 22 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: 6 (12%)
Good: 36 (71%)
Requires improvement: 7 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: 11 (38%)
Good: 17 (59%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 34 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Stroud
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 32 (82%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 34 (92%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 25 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 33 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 25 (74%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 7 (28%)
Good: 18 (72%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swansea West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Swindon North
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 34 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Swindon South
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 33 (85%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tamworth
Outstanding: 6 (13%)
Good: 33 (72%)
Requires improvement: 7 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tatton
Outstanding: 9 (21%)
Good: 32 (76%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 35 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Telford
Outstanding: 4 (9%)
Good: 32 (73%)
Requires improvement: 7 (16%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 31 (76%)
Requires improvement: 6 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
The Wrekin
Outstanding: 7 (17%)
Good: 30 (71%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 54 (83%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 6 (9%)
Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Thurrock
Outstanding: 8 (21%)
Good: 29 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 1 (2%)
Good: 36 (77%)
Requires improvement: 8 (17%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Tonbridge
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 31 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tooting
Outstanding: 9 (30%)
Good: 20 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torbay
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 26 (79%)
Requires improvement: 4 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 4 (8%)
Good: 40 (80%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tottenham
Outstanding: 13 (30%)
Good: 28 (65%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 4 (10%)
Good: 32 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 28 (72%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Twickenham
Outstanding: 15 (42%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tynemouth
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 31 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 10 (25%)
Good: 27 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 13 (36%)
Good: 20 (56%)
Requires improvement: 3 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 9 (24%)
Good: 27 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Wallasey
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 8 (23%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: 10 (19%)
Good: 37 (70%)
Requires improvement: 5 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Walthamstow
Outstanding: 9 (26%)
Good: 23 (66%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warrington North
Outstanding: 5 (12%)
Good: 36 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warrington South
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 35 (85%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 29 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 8 (18%)
Good: 33 (75%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Watford
Outstanding: 9 (23%)
Good: 26 (67%)
Requires improvement: 4 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Waveney Valley
Outstanding: 6 (11%)
Good: 40 (73%)
Requires improvement: 9 (16%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 2 (5%)
Good: 36 (88%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 3 (8%)
Good: 31 (78%)
Requires improvement: 5 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: 3 (6%)
Good: 40 (85%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 32 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
West Bromwich
Outstanding: 5 (14%)
Good: 25 (71%)
Requires improvement: 5 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Dorset
Outstanding: 2 (4%)
Good: 35 (73%)
Requires improvement: 9 (19%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: 14 (33%)
Good: 26 (62%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Lancashire
Outstanding: 13 (22%)
Good: 42 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (3%)
West Suffolk
Outstanding: 6 (15%)
Good: 32 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 7 (13%)
Good: 42 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 3 (6%)
Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: 2 (3%)
Good: 56 (90%)
Requires improvement: 3 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: 8 (14%)
Good: 40 (71%)
Requires improvement: 7 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: 7 (12%)
Good: 47 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 8 (20%)
Good: 30 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Wigan
Outstanding: 11 (31%)
Good: 21 (58%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wimbledon
Outstanding: 9 (30%)
Good: 21 (70%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Winchester
Outstanding: 10 (23%)
Good: 31 (72%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Windsor
Outstanding: 6 (14%)
Good: 35 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wirral West
Outstanding: 7 (19%)
Good: 28 (76%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Witham
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 38 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Witney
Outstanding: 5 (11%)
Good: 39 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Woking
Outstanding: 6 (18%)
Good: 23 (70%)
Requires improvement: 3 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Wokingham
Outstanding: 7 (16%)
Good: 36 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (2%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: 10 (22%)
Good: 30 (65%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 11 (24%)
Good: 32 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (4%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: 5 (10%)
Good: 39 (78%)
Requires improvement: 4 (8%)
Inadequate: 2 (4%)
Worcester
Outstanding: 5 (15%)
Good: 27 (79%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: 9 (18%)
Good: 33 (67%)
Requires improvement: 6 (12%)
Inadequate: 1 (2%)
Worthing West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 22 (81%)
Requires improvement: 4 (15%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Wrexham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wycombe
Outstanding: 6 (17%)
Good: 23 (64%)
Requires improvement: 6 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 4 (11%)
Good: 26 (74%)
Requires improvement: 4 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: 8 (22%)
Good: 25 (68%)
Requires improvement: 2 (5%)
Inadequate: 2 (5%)
Yeovil
Outstanding: 10 (23%)
Good: 27 (61%)
Requires improvement: 4 (9%)
Inadequate: 3 (7%)
York Central
Outstanding: 4 (13%)
Good: 26 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Outer
Outstanding: 3 (10%)
Good: 25 (81%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)

Children's social care§

This map shows the percentage of children's social care providers with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Amber Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashfield
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashford
Outstanding: 2 (18%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Aylesbury
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Banbury
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Barking
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barnsley North
Outstanding: 4 (31%)
Good: 8 (62%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (8%)
Barnsley South
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Basingstoke
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 5 (33%)
Good: 9 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bath
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Battersea
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Beaconsfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bedford
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 4 (31%)
Good: 8 (62%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birkenhead
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 5 (29%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%)
Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 11 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (21%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 2 (18%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackburn
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 12 (71%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackpool South
Outstanding: 1 (3%)
Good: 27 (90%)
Requires improvement: 2 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolsover
Outstanding: 4 (67%)
Good: 1 (17%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolton North East
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%)
Bolton West
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%)
Bootle
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bournemouth East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bracknell
Outstanding: 3 (50%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford South
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Braintree
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brent East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brent West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bridgwater
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 4 (44%)
Requires improvement: 4 (44%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol Central
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol East
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol North East
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol North West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 3 (33%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broxbourne
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broxtowe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Burnley
Outstanding: 1 (5%)
Good: 13 (68%)
Requires improvement: 4 (21%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%)
Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 14 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury North
Outstanding: 2 (14%)
Good: 10 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (20%)
Requires improvement: 4 (80%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Calder Valley
Outstanding: 4 (24%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%)
Cambridge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cannock Chase
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 17 (74%)
Requires improvement: 3 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (9%)
Canterbury
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff North
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cardiff West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Carlisle
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Castle Point
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Central Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cheadle
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 9 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelmsford
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cheltenham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 9 (90%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesterfield
Outstanding: 3 (38%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chichester
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chippenham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chorley
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 12 (67%)
Requires improvement: 5 (28%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Christchurch
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
City of Durham
Outstanding: 5 (31%)
Good: 10 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Clacton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Colchester
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Colne Valley
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%)
Congleton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 7 (70%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry North West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crawley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 9 (69%)
Requires improvement: 3 (23%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%)
Croydon South
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon West
Outstanding: 3 (21%)
Good: 11 (79%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Darlington
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 11 (58%)
Requires improvement: 6 (32%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dartford
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Daventry
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derby North
Outstanding: 4 (31%)
Good: 8 (62%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derby South
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 6 (50%)
Requires improvement: 5 (42%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%)
Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 4 (33%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster North
Outstanding: 3 (38%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%)
Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (50%)
Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 5 (23%)
Good: 17 (77%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dudley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Easington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Ham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Hampshire
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Surrey
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Thanet
Outstanding: 4 (19%)
Good: 14 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Wiltshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 3 (43%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastbourne
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastleigh
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Enfield North
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epping Forest
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 2 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erewash
Outstanding: 5 (42%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exeter
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%)
Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Fylde
Outstanding: 2 (6%)
Good: 29 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Gainsborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gedling
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 4 (44%)
Requires improvement: 3 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gloucester
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%)
Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 16 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gosport
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gower
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gravesham
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (50%)
Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 3 (43%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Guildford
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Halesowen
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 2 (29%)
Halifax
Outstanding: 6 (27%)
Good: 13 (59%)
Requires improvement: 3 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 3 (33%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%)
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harlow
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow West
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hartlepool
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 10 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%)
Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Havant
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%)
Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (8%)
Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hendon
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%)
Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 5 (25%)
Good: 14 (70%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertsmere
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hexham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 3 (12%)
Good: 20 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
High Peak
Outstanding: 5 (33%)
Good: 8 (53%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 3 (30%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hitchin
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Horsham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Huddersfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Huntingdon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hyndburn
Outstanding: 4 (20%)
Good: 12 (60%)
Requires improvement: 4 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ilford North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 12 (92%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ilford South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 12 (71%)
Requires improvement: 4 (24%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%)
Ipswich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington North
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kettering
Outstanding: 2 (18%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Knowsley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 13 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%)
Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 5 (24%)
Good: 13 (62%)
Requires improvement: 2 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%)
Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds East
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds North East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds North West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds South
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester East
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester South
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester West
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewes
Outstanding: 5 (50%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lichfield
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lincoln
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%)
Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 7 (64%)
Requires improvement: 3 (27%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 8 (73%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Loughborough
Outstanding: 5 (71%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lowestoft
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Luton North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Macclesfield
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maidenhead
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Makerfield
Outstanding: 3 (18%)
Good: 11 (65%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maldon
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mansfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 15 (79%)
Requires improvement: 2 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 2 (15%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (15%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (8%)
Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (30%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Monmouthshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 7 (24%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 3 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
New Forest East
Outstanding: 6 (38%)
Good: 8 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
New Forest West
Outstanding: 3 (50%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newark
Outstanding: 5 (33%)
Good: 7 (47%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (7%)
Newbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 4 (20%)
Good: 12 (60%)
Requires improvement: 4 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 2 (15%)
Good: 9 (69%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 3 (33%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 10 (83%)
Requires improvement: 2 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Cornwall
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Cotswolds
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Dorset
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Durham
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 13 (72%)
Requires improvement: 3 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 2 (10%)
Good: 17 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Norfolk
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Northumberland
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Shropshire
Outstanding: 2 (11%)
Good: 14 (74%)
Requires improvement: 2 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%)
North Somerset
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 3 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 3 (43%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Essex
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Norfolk
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Northampton North
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 5 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Northampton South
Outstanding: 1 (7%)
Good: 9 (64%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: 3 (21%)
Norwich North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Norwich South
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham East
Outstanding: 5 (29%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 2 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham South
Outstanding: 3 (30%)
Good: 5 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nuneaton
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%)
Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 14 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Orpington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%)
Oxford East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peckham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 13 (81%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peterborough
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 3 (25%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontypridd
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Poole
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%)
Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Preston
Outstanding: 3 (14%)
Good: 12 (57%)
Requires improvement: 5 (24%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%)
Putney
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 3 (27%)
Good: 6 (55%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (9%)
Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reading Central
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Redcar
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Redditch
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reigate
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 2 (13%)
Good: 7 (47%)
Requires improvement: 5 (33%)
Inadequate: 1 (7%)
Richmond Park
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rochdale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 13 (87%)
Requires improvement: 2 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Romford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 3 (12%)
Good: 20 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rother Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rotherham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rugby
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (25%)
Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 3 (43%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Salford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (89%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Salisbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sefton Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (40%)
Requires improvement: 4 (40%)
Inadequate: 2 (20%)
Selby
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%)
Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 5 (56%)
Good: 3 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield South East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Shipley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 8 (28%)
Good: 19 (66%)
Requires improvement: 1 (3%)
Inadequate: 1 (3%)
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Slough
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%)
Smethwick
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 3 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Dorset
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 2 (13%)
Good: 10 (67%)
Requires improvement: 3 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Leicestershire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Norfolk
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Ribble
Outstanding: 3 (20%)
Good: 6 (40%)
Requires improvement: 6 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shields
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shropshire
Outstanding: 1 (5%)
Good: 17 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Suffolk
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 7 (70%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Devon
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 1 (9%)
Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southampton Test
Outstanding: 3 (50%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southport
Outstanding: 3 (14%)
Good: 15 (68%)
Requires improvement: 4 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Spelthorne
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Spen Valley
Outstanding: 3 (25%)
Good: 7 (58%)
Requires improvement: 2 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Albans
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Helens North
Outstanding: 4 (17%)
Good: 13 (57%)
Requires improvement: 6 (26%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 10 (59%)
Requires improvement: 7 (41%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Ives
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stafford
Outstanding: 2 (13%)
Good: 11 (69%)
Requires improvement: 3 (19%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 3 (9%)
Good: 27 (84%)
Requires improvement: 2 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 1 (11%)
Stevenage
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockport
Outstanding: 1 (6%)
Good: 14 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: 1 (6%)
Stockton North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (90%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockton West
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 11 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (21%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 1 (8%)
Good: 10 (77%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 2 (8%)
Good: 20 (77%)
Requires improvement: 4 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 2 (7%)
Good: 23 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stourbridge
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stroud
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 1 (11%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 1 (11%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 3 (43%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swansea West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Swindon North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swindon South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tamworth
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tatton
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%)
Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 2 (8%)
Good: 20 (80%)
Requires improvement: 3 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Telford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
The Wrekin
Outstanding: 1 (5%)
Good: 17 (85%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%)
Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thurrock
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tonbridge
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Tooting
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torbay
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 3 (27%)
Good: 6 (55%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tottenham
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Twickenham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tynemouth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (57%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%)
Wallasey
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 3 (38%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Walthamstow
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warrington North
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 19 (79%)
Requires improvement: 3 (13%)
Inadequate: 1 (4%)
Warrington South
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (20%)
Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Watford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Waveney Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 3 (25%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (8%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Bromwich
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Dorset
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Lancashire
Outstanding: 4 (18%)
Good: 14 (64%)
Requires improvement: 4 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Suffolk
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 1 (9%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 13 (87%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: 1 (7%)
Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 16 (94%)
Requires improvement: 1 (6%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wigan
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 10 (91%)
Requires improvement: 1 (9%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wimbledon
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Winchester
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Windsor
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wirral West
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Witham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (17%)
Witney
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Woking
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wokingham
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 11 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 8 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 13 (93%)
Requires improvement: 1 (7%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Worcester
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Worthing West
Outstanding: 1 (13%)
Good: 7 (88%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wrexham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wycombe
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Yeovil
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Outer
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)

Further education and skills§

This map shows the percentage of further education and skills providers with different Ofsted ratings.

100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Hexmap Aldershot
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Aldridge-Brownhills
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Altrincham and Sale West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Amber Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Arundel and South Downs
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Ashfield
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ashton-under-Lyne
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Aylesbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Banbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bangor Aberconwy
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barking
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barnsley North
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Barnsley South
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Barrow and Furness
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Basildon and Billericay
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Basingstoke
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bassetlaw
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bath
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Battersea
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beaconsfield
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Beckenham and Penge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bedford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bethnal Green and Stepney
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Beverley and Holderness
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bexhill and Battle
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bexleyheath and Crayford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bicester and Woodstock
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birkenhead
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 2 (33%)
Requires improvement: 3 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Edgbaston
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Erdington
Outstanding: 2 (50%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Ladywood
Outstanding: 1 (4%)
Good: 21 (78%)
Requires improvement: 5 (19%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Northfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Perry Barr
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Selly Oak
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Birmingham Yardley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bishop Auckland
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackburn
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackley and Middleton South
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Blackpool North and Fleetwood
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blackpool South
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blaydon and Consett
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Blyth and Ashington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Bolsover
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Bolton North East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (20%)
Requires improvement: 3 (60%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%)
Bolton South and Walkden
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bolton West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bootle
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Boston and Skegness
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bournemouth East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bournemouth West
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bracknell
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford East
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bradford West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Braintree
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Brent East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brent West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Brentford and Isleworth
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brentwood and Ongar
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Bridgwater
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bridlington and The Wolds
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brigg and Immingham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Brighton Pavilion
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol East
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol North East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol North West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bristol South
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broadland and Fakenham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Bromley and Biggin Hill
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bromsgrove
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Broxbourne
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (100%)
Broxtowe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Buckingham and Bletchley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Burnley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Burton and Uttoxeter
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (40%)
Bury North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Caerfyrddin
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Calder Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Camborne and Redruth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cambridge
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cannock Chase
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Canterbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff South and Penarth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cardiff West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Carlisle
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Carshalton and Wallington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Castle Point
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Central Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chatham and Aylesford
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Cheadle
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelmsford
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chelsea and Fulham
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cheltenham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesham and Amersham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chester North and Neston
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chester South and Eddisbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chesterfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 1 (13%)
Inadequate: 2 (25%)
Chichester
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chingford and Woodford Green
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chippenham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chipping Barnet
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Chorley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Christchurch
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cities of London and Westminster
Outstanding: 3 (13%)
Good: 15 (65%)
Requires improvement: 5 (22%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
City of Durham
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Clacton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Clapham and Brixton Hill
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Colchester
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Colne Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Congleton
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Corby and East Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry North West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Coventry South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 4 (44%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Cramlington and Killingworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crawley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Crewe and Nantwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Croydon South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Croydon West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 2 (29%)
Dagenham and Rainham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Darlington
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dartford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Daventry
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derby North
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Derby South
Outstanding: 2 (20%)
Good: 7 (70%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%)
Derbyshire Dales
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dewsbury and Batley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Didcot and Wantage
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Doncaster Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Doncaster North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dorking and Horley
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Dover and Deal
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Droitwich and Evesham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dudley
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dulwich and West Norwood
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Ealing Central and Acton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ealing North
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Ealing Southall
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Earley and Woodley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Easington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Grinstead and Uckfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Ham
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Hampshire
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Surrey
Outstanding: 2 (67%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Thanet
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Wiltshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
East Worthing and Shoreham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastbourne
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eastleigh
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Edmonton and Winchmore Hill
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ellesmere Port and Bromborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Eltham and Chislehurst
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ely and East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Enfield North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epping Forest
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Epsom and Ewell
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erewash
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Erith and Thamesmead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Esher and Walton
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exeter
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Exmouth and Exeter East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Fareham and Waterlooville
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Farnham and Bordon
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Faversham and Mid Kent
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Feltham and Heston
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Filton and Bradley Stoke
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Finchley and Golders Green
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%)
Folkestone and Hythe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Forest of Dean
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Frome and East Somerset
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Fylde
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gainsborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gateshead Central and Whickham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%)
Gedling
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gillingham and Rainham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Glastonbury and Somerton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gloucester
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Godalming and Ash
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Goole and Pocklington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gorton and Denton
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Gosport
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gower
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Grantham and Bourne
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Gravesham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Great Yarmouth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Greenwich and Woolwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Guildford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney North and Stoke Newington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hackney South and Shoreditch
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Halesowen
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%)
Halifax
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hamble Valley
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hammersmith and Chiswick
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hampstead and Highgate
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harlow
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harpenden and Berkhamsted
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrogate and Knaresborough
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harrow West
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hartlepool
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Harwich and North Essex
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hastings and Rye
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Havant
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hayes and Harlington
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Hazel Grove
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hemel Hempstead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hendon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Henley and Thame
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hereford and South Herefordshire
Outstanding: 3 (38%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Herne Bay and Sandwich
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Hertford and Stortford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hertsmere
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hexham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Heywood and Middleton North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
High Peak
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Hinckley and Bosworth
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Hitchin
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Holborn and St Pancras
Outstanding: 2 (10%)
Good: 16 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (5%)
Inadequate: 1 (5%)
Honiton and Sidmouth
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Hornchurch and Upminster
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hornsey and Friern Barnet
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Horsham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Houghton and Sunderland South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hove and Portslade
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Huddersfield
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 7 (78%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Huntingdon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Hyndburn
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ilford North
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ilford South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 1 (50%)
Ipswich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Isle of Wight West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington North
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Islington South and Finsbury
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 6 (60%)
Requires improvement: 3 (30%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Jarrow and Gateshead East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Keighley and Ilkley
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Kenilworth and Southam
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kensington and Bayswater
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kettering
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston and Surbiton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (50%)
Requires improvement: 3 (38%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%)
Kingswinford and South Staffordshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Knowsley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lancaster and Wyre
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds Central and Headingley
Outstanding: 3 (20%)
Good: 9 (60%)
Requires improvement: 3 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds North East
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Leeds North West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds South West and Morley
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leeds West and Pudsey
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester South
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leicester West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Leigh and Atherton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewes
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lewisham West and East Dulwich
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Leyton and Wanstead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lichfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Lincoln
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Garston
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 1 (50%)
Liverpool Riverside
Outstanding: 2 (12%)
Good: 13 (76%)
Requires improvement: 2 (12%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Walton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool Wavertree
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Liverpool West Derby
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Loughborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Louth and Horncastle
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Lowestoft
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Luton North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Macclesfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maidenhead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Maidstone and Malling
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Makerfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%)
Maldon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 14 (82%)
Requires improvement: 3 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Rusholme
Outstanding: 4 (57%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Manchester Withington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mansfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Melksham and Devizes
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Melton and Syston
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Meriden and Solihull East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Buckinghamshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Cheshire
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Derbyshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Dorset and North Poole
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Leicestershire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Norfolk
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid Sussex
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mid and South Pembrokeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Middlesbrough and Thornaby East
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Milton Keynes Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Milton Keynes North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Mitcham and Morden
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Monmouthshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Morecambe and Lunesdale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Neath and Swansea East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
New Forest East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
New Forest West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newark
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Newbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (75%)
Requires improvement: 2 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 11 (85%)
Requires improvement: 2 (15%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle upon Tyne North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newcastle-under-Lyme
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newport West and Islwyn
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newton Abbot
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Newton Aycliffe and Spennymoor
Outstanding: 1 (10%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Normanton and Hemsworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Bedfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Cornwall
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Cotswolds
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Dorset
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Durham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (100%)
North East Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
North East Derbyshire
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Hampshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North East Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
North East Somerset and Hanham
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
North Herefordshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Norfolk
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
North Northumberland
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Shropshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North Somerset
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
North Warwickshire and Bedworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Essex
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Hampshire
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Leicestershire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
North West Norfolk
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Northampton North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Northampton South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Norwich North
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Norwich South
Outstanding: 1 (14%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham North and Kimberley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nottingham South
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Nuneaton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Old Bexley and Sidcup
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oldham East and Saddleworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oldham West, Chadderton and Royton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Orpington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ossett and Denby Dale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oxford East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Oxford West and Abingdon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peckham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pendle and Clitheroe
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penistone and Stocksbridge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Penrith and Solway
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Peterborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Plymouth Moor View
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 2 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontefract, Castleford and Knottingley
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Pontypridd
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Poole
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Poplar and Limehouse
Outstanding: 2 (22%)
Good: 5 (56%)
Requires improvement: 2 (22%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Portsmouth North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Portsmouth South
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Preston
Outstanding: 3 (75%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Putney
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Queen's Park and Maida Vale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rawmarsh and Conisbrough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rayleigh and Wickford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reading Central
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reading West and Mid Berkshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Redcar
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (100%)
Redditch
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (20%)
Requires improvement: 4 (80%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Reigate
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ribble Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Richmond Park
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Richmond and Northallerton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rochdale
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rochester and Strood
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (71%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Romford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Romsey and Southampton North
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Rossendale and Darwen
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Rother Valley
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Rotherham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rugby
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Runcorn and Helsby
Outstanding: 2 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Runnymede and Weybridge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rushcliffe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Rutland and Stamford
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Salford
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 1 (17%)
Requires improvement: 4 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Salisbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Scarborough and Whitby
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Scunthorpe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sefton Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Selby
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sevenoaks
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Brightside and Hillsborough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 7 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield Hallam
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Sheffield Heeley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sheffield South East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sherwood Forest
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Shipley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Shrewsbury
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 1 (25%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Skipton and Ripon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sleaford and North Hykeham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Slough
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Smethwick
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Solihull West and Shirley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Basildon and East Thurrock
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Cotswolds
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Derbyshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Dorset
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South East Cornwall
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Holland and The Deepings
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Leicestershire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
South Norfolk
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Northamptonshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Ribble
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shields
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Shropshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South Suffolk
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Devon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 3 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
South West Hertfordshire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
South West Norfolk
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
South West Wiltshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southampton Itchen
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southampton Test
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend East and Rochford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southend West and Leigh
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southgate and Wood Green
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Southport
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Spelthorne
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Spen Valley
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Albans
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Austell and Newquay
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Helens North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Helens South and Whiston
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Ives
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stafford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Staffordshire Moorlands
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Stalybridge and Hyde
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stevenage
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockport
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockton North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stockton West
Outstanding: 1 (100%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 8 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (10%)
Inadequate: 1 (10%)
Stoke-on-Trent North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stoke-on-Trent South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stone, Great Wyrley and Penkridge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stourbridge
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford and Bow
Outstanding: 1 (20%)
Good: 2 (40%)
Requires improvement: 2 (40%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stratford-on-Avon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Streatham and Croydon North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Stretford and Urmston
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (33%)
Stroud
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Suffolk Coastal
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sunderland Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 6 (86%)
Requires improvement: 1 (14%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Surrey Heath
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sussex Weald
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sutton Coldfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Sutton and Cheam
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swansea West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swindon North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Swindon South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tamworth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tatton
Outstanding: 2 (25%)
Good: 5 (63%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (13%)
Taunton and Wellington
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Telford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tewkesbury
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
The Wrekin
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thirsk and Malton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Thornbury and Yate
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Thurrock
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tipton and Wednesbury
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tiverton and Minehead
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tonbridge
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tooting
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torbay
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Torridge and Tavistock
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tottenham
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 3 (50%)
Requires improvement: 2 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Truro and Falmouth
Outstanding: 1 (50%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tunbridge Wells
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Twickenham
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Tynemouth
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Outstanding: 1 (25%)
Good: 3 (75%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Vauxhall and Camberwell Green
Outstanding: 2 (17%)
Good: 10 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wakefield and Rothwell
Outstanding: 2 (29%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 2 (29%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wallasey
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Walsall and Bloxwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Walthamstow
Outstanding: 2 (40%)
Good: 3 (60%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warrington North
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warrington South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Warwick and Leamington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Washington and Gateshead South
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 9 (82%)
Requires improvement: 2 (18%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Watford
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 1 (20%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Waveney Valley
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Weald of Kent
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wellingborough and Rushden
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wells and Mendip Hills
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Welwyn Hatfield
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Bromwich
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (80%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 1 (20%)
West Dorset
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
West Ham and Beckton
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (17%)
Inadequate: 1 (17%)
West Lancashire
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (25%)
Inadequate: 1 (25%)
West Suffolk
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
West Worcestershire
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Westmorland and Lonsdale
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 0 (0%)
Requires improvement: 1 (100%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Weston-super-Mare
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wetherby and Easingwold
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Whitehaven and Workington
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Widnes and Halewood
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wigan
Outstanding: 1 (17%)
Good: 5 (83%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wimbledon
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Winchester
Outstanding: 2 (33%)
Good: 4 (67%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Windsor
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Wirral West
Outstanding: 0 (null%)
Good: 0 (null%)
Requires improvement: 0 (null%)
Inadequate: 0 (null%)
Witham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Witney
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Woking
Outstanding: 1 (33%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wokingham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton North East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (67%)
Requires improvement: 1 (33%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton South East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wolverhampton West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 3 (43%)
Requires improvement: 3 (43%)
Inadequate: 1 (14%)
Worcester
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Worsley and Eccles
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Worthing West
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 2 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wrexham
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wycombe
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wyre Forest
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (50%)
Requires improvement: 1 (50%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Wythenshawe and Sale East
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Yeovil
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 1 (33%)
Requires improvement: 2 (67%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Central
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 5 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
York Outer
Outstanding: 0 (0%)
Good: 4 (100%)
Requires improvement: 0 (0%)
Inadequate: 0 (0%)
Data: Inspection outcomes (Ofsted, OGL). / Hex layout: 2024 constituencies (Open Innovations and contributors)